Gun Owner Favors Sensible Limits

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Letter to President Trump on Military Base Victim Disarmament

Shared via email by WarOnGuns Correspondent CDT : Dear President Trump: This past Thursday, there was a spree shooting at Fort Stewart, exacerbated by the fact that none of the servicemen in a position to control the shooter were armed. I won't waste any language further describing the attack, I'm confident you're aware of it. There have been seven other spree shootings with this same profile since 2009, all made possible by President Clinton's ban on soldiers carrying arms inside military bases (DOD Directive 5210.56). There is no place in the USA for victim disarmament policies, but *especially* not on military bases. Back in 2015, you volunteered this pledge to Fredy Riehl of AmmoLand.com: "As Commander-in-Chief, I would mandate that soldiers remain armed and on alert at our military bases. President Clinton never should have passed a ban on soldiers being able to protect themselves on bases. America’s Armed Forces will be armed. They will be able to defend the...
Read more

ACLU (Arms-Confiscating Lies Unmasked)

Image
David Codrea Originally published on  GunTruths.com  (1999)   American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California Executive Director Ramona Ripston claims the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to keep and bear arms, but rather, was only intended to provide for the right of states to maintain a militia. I challenged her to prove this. Since her position was based on the concept of original intent, my challenge centered on that issue, i.e., I asked her to provide evidence based on writings from America's Revolutionary era to substantiate her claim. The following is her response: Dear Mr. Codrea: As you requested, I am enclosing copies of information the ACLU of Southern California has published on the Second Amendment. Sincerely, Ramona Ripston Executive Director encl. Enclosure #1 is a fold-out brochure claiming "When the founders of the United States of America (inset portraits of Jefferson and Madison) wrote the Second Amendment...(photo of semiautom...
Read more

ATF classifies Chore Boy pot scrubber pads NFA firearms

Image
Reposted from old Examiner article retrieved via Internet Archive-- embedded links may not work.   David Codrea Gun Rights Examiner November 15, 2011 Chore Boy--the most trusted name in unregistered NFA firearms.  Credits:  David Codrea The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Firearms Technology Branch has deemed “Chore Boy copper cleaning pads, along with fiberglass insulation,” a firearm, subject to registration and a $200 transfer tax, an official letter obtained recently by  Gun Rights Examiner  reveals.  The response to an attorney inquiry by John R. Spencer, Chief, Firearms Technology Branch, offers one of the more creatively restrictive assessments since  ATF declared a shoestring to be a machinegun . The rationale Spencer uses: A silencer is a firearm per U.S. Code, subject to National Firearms Act registration and transfer tax requirements. “[S]ound/gas absorbing materials manufactured from Chore Boy copper cleaning pads, alon...
Read more