SPJ accepts nominations for Black Hole Award highlighting violations of the public's right to know

 

The Society of Professional Journalists launched the Black Hole Award to highlight the most heinous violations of the public's right to know.By exposing such abuses, SPJ’s Freedom of Information Committee seeks to educate the public about their rights and call attention to those who would interfere with openness and transparency.

SPJ is accepting nominations through Feb. 19. Please email nominations to SPJ Region 10 Coordinator Donald W. Meyers. The "winner" will be announced during Sunshine Week, March 12-18. 

Previous "winners" include Idaho Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin (2022), Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry (2021), Connecticut State Police (2020), President Donald Trump and his administration (2018) and New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission (2017). 

Black Hole Award nominations should meet the following criteria:1. Violation, in spirit or letter, of any federal or state open-government law. This means either a clear violation of the statute governing access to public records or public meetings, or using an ambiguity or loophole in the law to avoid having to comply with the law. For example: conducting multiple meetings with small groups that do not constitute a quorum, email discussions outside the public view, or charging unreasonable amounts to copy documents.2. Egregiousness. In order to maintain the effectiveness of the Black Hole Award, it should not be given for just any openness violation. Recipients should know they are trampling on the public’s rights, placing personal or political interests ahead of the public good or endangering public welfare. Examples might include an agency or official who attempted to keep information secret to avoid embarrassment or hide misdeeds.3. Impact. The case should be one that affects the public rather than an individual. The award should not be used to settle vendettas against recalcitrant bureaucrats. Withholding information should hurt the general public rather than an individual.SPJ’s Freedom of Information Committee welcomes nominations from local SPJ chapters, SPJ members, other journalists and private citizens.

Nominations should include, where possible, supporting documentation. Documentation can include any of the following:

  • News coverage of the violation.
  • Public records chronicling the dispute.
  • Legal papers if there was a lawsuit or other legal action involved in the matter.
  • Any expert opinion from an attorney, official or open-government expert that the violation occurred.
  • Contact information for the parties involved to allow the committee to obtain more information if needed, including from the government official.

Thank you for helping spread the word about the importance of freedom of information and open government. We hope you'll consider nominating an official or agency deserving of the "award." Plus, keep an eye out for more information about Sunshine Week 2023, an annual nationwide celebration of access to public information.

This email was sent to dcodrea@hotmail.comSociety of Professional Journalists, 3909 N Meridian St, Suite 200, Indianapolis, Indiana 46208, United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“Nobody wants to take your guns.”

 Compiled by WarOnGuns Correspondent Scott J Sen Diane Feinstein (1995): “If I could’ve gotten [sic] 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an OUTRIGHT ban, picking up every one of them, ‘Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em [sic] all in’, I would’ve done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffI-tWh37UY Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke (September 12, 2019): "Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW1HPoqqB_8 "...David Muir asked O'Rourke: "Are you proposing taking away their guns?" O'Rourke answered, "Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47."" https://www.npr.org/2019/09/12/760386808/orourke-promises-to-take-your-ar-15-but-americans-are-split-on-buybacks Colorado State Capitol (June 5, 2023): "Protestors stage sit-in at the state Capitol to demand all-out gun ban…" Protestor sign:  "SAVE A 2n...
Read more

FBI Director Candidate Wray’s Adopting Language of Left on Guns Merits Further Scrutiny

Image
Will Wray swear an oath to enforce “commonsense” gun legislation or to “support and defend the Constitution”? (Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing/YouTube) July 13, 2017 Attorney Christopher Wray, President Donald Trump’s nominee to head the Federal Bureau of Investigation, gave a response to a “gun control” question in Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that raises flags for right to keep and bear arms advocates.  Per The Daily Signal , Wray was being “pressed” by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. “on whether he would back universal background checks for gun buyers.” Wray tried to get around specifics at first, talking in general terms about “efforts to deal with gun violence” and how he “would want to take a look at any specific legislative proposal and get back to you once I have evaluated [it].” But Blumenthal, as committed an  enemy of the Second Amendment  as ever put one hand on a Bible, raised the other and proceeded to lie though his teeth, was intent o...
Read more